Description: A young girl is institutionalized his abusive stepfather. Recession is an alternative reality as a strategy to cope with, it provides a plan which will help her escape from the mental institution. Review: Here's the thing about this movie, your demands. You should be able to let go, be aware that after a stylish modern comics (from the adult genre), and just go with the film. Let him take you on the journey, which is a beautiful thing.You / beautiful should also pay attention. The film is steeped in metaphor and more cerebral than expected. You have to work to understand what happened and part of the job that let you take him away. If you can do this, and your friend can do this, you'll have hours of conversation once about what it means, what the metaphor means, and what actually happens in reality primary mental hospital. If you can not do it, you might be thinking that this movie is stupid, do, and will. But you'd be wrong. Oh ... and besides all of the above ... the fight scenes are an absolute nerdgasm, a party Sci-Fi/Fantasy epic proportions. Steam-punk Nazi Zombies ... I left this movie feeling like I just had a threesome with Isaac Asimov and Anne McCaffery. I really like it.
Year: 1972 Genre: Crime, Drama Director: Francis Ford Coppola Starring: Marlon Brando, Al Pacino, James Caan
Description: The aging patriarch of an organized crime dynasty takes control of his clandestine empire to his son enthusiastically. Review: Instead of focusing on all of The Godfather is a great, a lot easier for me to assess its quality is what is bad. Almost every movie is something that I dont like it, but I can honestly say that I did not change anything in the Godfather. There is nothing weak about it and nothing that stands out as bad. That's why it will receive ten ten.This is one of those movies that I wonder why I had not seen before. Acting by all players is great, Marlon Brando comes across perfectly head of the family, and James Caan, and Al Pacino are excellent as his son. Nino Rota's soundtrack is also very memorable, bringing back memories of the movie every time you hear it. The land is good for him to get ten out of ten, and is far from predictable, and the film is the definition of a large epic.The the film is shocking how each death is nearly at immediately and extends to ten years, with so many different things going on every minute of it is great entertainment. For a well-made and entertaining film that is only the first part of a trilogy, but it is a great movie on its own as a separate. If you have not seen it, what are you waiting for? This was an acclaimed film that will not disappoint.
Year: 1998 Genre: Crime, Thriller Director: Guy Ritchie Starring: Jason Flemyng, Dexter Fletcher, Nick Moran
Description: Four London working class stiffs pool their money to put one in a card game with high stakes, but things go wrong and they end up paying half a million pounds has a week to arrive at checkout. Review: The first time I saw this movie, not only because of the difficulty in understanding much of the dialogue was strange accent, but because the actors spoke so damn fast. But despite this, I was addicted to the word. We review the lease of any other film would be shot about 20 minutes later and LS & 2SB want to go, because my wife is very comfortable to begin with. LS & 2SB WellII've lost count of the number of times and still find it better to watch this film, you can not put my finger is now hooked. The most obvious feature of this film I am beautiful, serious and humorous at the same time are likely to be balanced between the two. The characters are two-dimensional. The villains are scary and they look like idiots, and keep getting the carpet pulled out from under them, good guys still think so smart. They are always in control of the situation has not projected how cool. Maybe the satire in this film about real life.The unique style that can be called a complete stop. I can be compared with LS & 2SB can not think of any movie. Pulp Fiction style Quite a few people, Goodfellas, Trainspotting and Reservoir Dogs is a mix, but I have a good description for LS & 2SB not somethingThe only if really desperate to describe this type of I honestly do not think MTV will be comedy offense I do not think there is anything wrong. Like music, videos, are all the non-stop action and sound. Something is always happening, but without the humor music videos reasonThe, in fact, is still quite strong. No one really tries to be funny, unusual, but more humor, really, you go, which is menacingly balance between serious and ridiculous. LS & 2SB I really disappointed with a couple of people that I think for this reason. If you are waiting for a belly laugh, Leslie Nielson, Jim Carrey, Steve Martin, any kind of comedy, or serious Al Pacino, Andy Garcia typecasted, typecasted DeNiro crime thriller, this movie finds BC down.My to load your favorite characters Rory Breaker (Vas Blackwood), Big Chris (Vinnie Jones), the over-the-top characters two-dimensional, the most obvious CU, NKI. Big Chris takes his son with him to collect the debt, and he and his son Rory Breaker chastises him in front of others can occur when taken by someone who has debt, even in drug havent excellent record single most camerawork withi chaotic, Lord, speaker blowing soundtrack, threaded area is beautiful, the perfect end to the grittiest visuals I've seen. Filled the sky scrapers see some type of reflective glass, or city shots, incredible special effects already accustomed. I never heard of this film, the actor, you can go back and replay to understand the dialogue, they were convicted of destruction, which look like buildings, wouldnt even be in the car scrap There is, perhaps, one by Hollywood make-up with one of the most used in the film, no love scenes, or romance, or even a complex relationship, no Oscar worthy performances, and that the budget of our movies perfect entertainmentWhere budgets depend on normal human talent working on this film any movie aloneIf 10 10 right, theres something more to it ......... itAnd ...... is emotional
Year: 1999 Genre: Action, Adventure, Fantasy Director: George Lucas Starring: Liam Neeson, Ewan McGregor, Natalie Portman
Description: Two Jedi Knight-term lock enemies and allies to find the boy in the balance of power could lead to a meeting, but long dormant reborn Sith declared its former glory.Two Jedi Knight-term lock enemies and allies to find the boy in the balance of power could lead to a meeting, but long dormant reborn Sith declared its former glory. Review: Of course, this movie had a ton of hype and the movie can live up to all this .... chatter chatter. Even if we assume that this movie is kind of disappointing. This film shows that it is not just special effects that made Star Wars fun to watch. It was as if George Lucas was so excited that he could do with CGI effects, he forgot what made the original trilogy so great that letters and symbols. Not a bad movie, but the problem many.-Many people let this film to be dull as they say it is only the first in another trilogy, and it's just creating all to follow. Wrong wrong wrong, this film was to be his first movie, and the other three movies were. It is necessary to have good characters and some interesting story .... is didnt. conflict in the story revolves around the trade dispute and the fate of the planet Naboo. Was anyone really care about this? Details of the dispute more vague and does not show actual generate enough interest for us to root for a party. An important conflict over Darth Sideous and its growth is kept far, far in the background. We do not even know why Darth Maul hate Jedis so .... it just does. Maybe Lucas likes Darth Maul with something like boba Fett (quiet and mysterious). He worked with boba Fett, because he was only supporting character rather than the villain. This movie really has no clear villain. I wish someone would have the courage and just told Lucas that his main story was lousy.-no one looks especially happy in this film. Qui-Gon is really the only character that can be associated with, and even that was far enough. Queen acts as a mannequin in most of her scenes (and looks like one). Obi-Wan Kenobi is haunting the film is useless, and never say anything interesting. The characters never seem to talk about anything except the plot (unlike the first film). C3PO and R2-D2 are pretty stupid. Jedi Council perceived as very cold and buracratic. I will never understand why they wrote Annakin as a class the student in this film. He was a teenager. His scenes with the Queen were clumsy. Not even going to discuss Jar Jar.Various more ...-midochlorians work seems just tacked on. Humor falls flat, unless you are very young child. Annakin destroys merchant ship at the end of each and safves, up by mistake! MPM and George Lucas seems to be very happy with their new toys CGI, they spend 95% of their time perfecting them. Honestly, I thought the FX Return of the Jedi were sharper and less cartoonish measured. Not all that memorable does not seem to happen here. This movie was never as good as the hype, but it could easily be much better than that. I've been waiting for this movie, but I first saw this movie I really get bored in the middle of it.There good points. Pod race was fun, as was the light saber battle at the end. There are some very good special effects throughout. I hope that Lucas just writers block when writing it. Maybe he will remember what he did the other movies, so a good time for Episode II. Although he seems to have spoiled his name already.
Year: 2012 Genre: Drama Director: Paul Thomas Anderson Starring: Joaquin Phoenix, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Amy Adams
Description: A Navy veteran comes home from the war and uncertainty worried about the future - until he is tantalized because andthe charismatic leader. Review: I was lucky enough to see this movie much earlier than most. I think that Anderson actually affects your step with these. It was strange to me that out of the theater, so I asked about most of all is what the hell is going to do next! The teacher is not an easy film to sit through, and sometimes do not even know what you want in a movie. But then you realize that the film does not want anything. All that is required to hold. More than his previous films, master, and the blood will actually venture into the field of film as pure cinema presentation of life. Anderson does not judge or look, simply stretch material that allows her characters to speak for themselves. Yes, there is a beginning, a middle and an end, but is there? Do we really have a sense of catharsis at the end of There Will Be Blood? Or simply to understand the man a little better? Anderson insisted, as I'm sure he would say the same for this film, There Will Be Blood was not a metaphor for anything. That's what it was. No hidden meaning, not sophisticated and often stereotyped subtext. Your man simply. As Hoffman's character says in the trailer for the Master - But above all, I am a film is an interesting idea caballero.Las head against soldiers, master slave Vs. Explores the anatomy of the relationship, so that it can be interpreted in any way that would like.Its beautifully filmed on 65/70mm film, which is the way I saw it, and the way I recommend to see if you get the chance. It feels almost as if Anderson gives the finger to the digital revolution, shooting his film on a high-resolution digital can only dream of getting there in a dozen Yes! , Year or so.The accióny dialogue is excellent as you would expect. Phoenix and Hoffman are on another level here, especially in the life of Phoenix paper. There are definitely times in this film that completely disappears into the role. There is a great deal of support Laura Dern and others.It will be difficult to put film in his body of work. More than anything, it feels like a natural extension of what we started with There Will Be Blood. This does not mean that it will continue this way, only that this is definitely a film focused more closely on some of their previous work together. I found it to be less attractive than some other of his works, and yet never a dull moment. You're always on tiptoe, trying to understand what is happening and who is directing. In reality, there is, but, as a man, a fascinating work.
Year: 2010 Genre: Comedy, Music Director: Nicholas Stoller Starring: Russell Brand, Rose Byrne, Jonah Hill
Description: Registration intern is hired to accompany out of control British rock star Aldous Snow Concert Theater The Greek. Review: Opening shot with Aldo Snow latest music video and then show its downward spiral leading to today was hilarious, a perfect start to this innovative comedy spin-off. Seen Forgetting Sarah Marshall, then that's exactly what you expect from a film about Aldo Snow similar. This film has a heart that I did not expect to see, buried wit obscene, vulgar, bright, but their brand there.Russell just opens his mouth and his words are comic gold. Jonah Hill make a move from your comfort zone a bit, a good guy and has no confidence. (Usually it is the idiot confident, for all opponents). Diddy gives surprisingly strong performance Im sure all shocked to see it. It really is hilarious! Its Repartee with everyone who comes in contact with is spot-on. The entire cast is hilarious one-liners and the two main characters really make this film a joy to draw watch.The is actually a creative, something you do not see much of today. Although the steps humor family jokes about Gross-out jokes are very clever. But the only thing you can expect when after rock and roll personified. Another point that surprised many was that ... many of the scenes from the trailer were not in the film. I thought it was a good thing and bad. Well why not show us things we have seen and gave us a chance to see new things. But bad because some of the scenes were real funny.For critics are hating this movie: Do you like comedy? Apatow Do you like stuff? Would you like Russell Brand and Jonah Hill? If the answer is no to any two of them ... review because this movie? Your opinion is worthless to people who actually do like these movies.
Year: 2009 Genre: Action, Adventure, Crime Director: Guy Ritchie Starring: Robert Downey Jr., Jude Law, Rachel McAdams
Description: Detective Sherlock Holmes and his stalwart partner Watson engage in a battle of wits andthe Brawn an enemy who threatens sites across England. Review: ... not a movie, but the number of self-professed Holmes aficionados who apparently do not have information about Holmes. For the record, Holmes was a miserable irresponsible drug addict who does not sleep on the floor, insult his best friend, his dog experience, and never wearing a cap deerstalkers (at least, not until television was invented). He was a fighter who has trained in martial arts and has a better chance of slums around the dirtiest rags, because he was the only suit.It Dr. Watson took her hand she really refined and became respectable society member. And, yes, we can say that this film takes place at the beginning of their relationship, because Watson is not married to his wife (retconning did not bother me too much, by the way, but you can avoid some of the re-imagining there , here). Speaking of the inevitable, Irene Adler, Holmes hard (is that a word?) It should be just thrown a potential love. Flirting, romance, and meet the requirements were drawn up almost irresistible director (and the whole damn public honest with themselves). Despite this, I felt Robert Downey, Jr., Sherlock Holmes, played to perfection. Its characteristic caustic attitude towards Lestrade and Watson sometimes how Id imagine it. He gave several warnings of observations and deductions that led Holmes to life in an almost unprecedented way. His fight scenes (preceded by the first superhuman calculations) show both the physical and the mental side of Holmes, Watson, so cant score enough vee, hiculent, but they constantly hint.As Watson, self- , Jude Law gave a wonderful performance. I was a little skeptical about how he fought, as Watson's war wounds, but his character and attitude were perfectly into the nose. His loyalty to Holmes, though his frustration he could not catch more experienced, I know. A person, regardless of the patient or the forgiveness tolerated Holmes forever without the occasional confrontation. Original Holmes, after all, did not exceed the offensive with his best friend, or even make fun of his deductive abilities at once. However, Watson could never abandon his friends in his time need.This version (or vision, if you will) by Sir Arthur Conan Doyles greatest creation may be a stuck-up, exciting s, more, veined than any other incarnation, but that does not make it any less true to the original. In addition to a little revisionist history of the case of female roles, there is not so far from the ordinary, and the number of references to Madonna changes that.
Year: 2012 Genre: Animation, Comedy, Family Director: Genndy Tartakovsky Starring: Adam Sandler, Andy Samberg, Selena Gomez
Description: Dracula, who operates a high-end resort away from the human world, goes into overprotective mode when a boy discovers the resort and falls for the teenage girls in age. Review: I gave a total of 10 because both my wife and I (and other theaters go through their reactions) enjoyed from the beginning to the end.Was is predictable? Of course. It is an animation aimed at children (what do you expect?), But like most animated films today, there were a number of hiding places and humor completely by young people (not unexpectedly lost Wü would be, since they are adults, after all, forking out over bread and it does not hurt to keep them entertained as well). The film is quite fast and very well done animation. Im usually really gave a little worried when I had high expectations of a film in clips / progress, but in this case I felt. This will add to our library when (finally) comes in the shelves. There are too many people looking for a great amount of depth and unpredictability of animated films, but that's a bit unrealistic (no pun intended) about it, think about these things before their animated films a reason. Was interrupted to accommodate this type of expectations. Fun and this film will be just that: FUN.
Year: 1999 Genre: Comedy, Drama Director: Dennis Dugan Starring: Adam Sandler, Joey Lauren Adams, Jon Stewart
Description: A lazy law school degree adopts a kid to impress his girlfriend, but everything does not go as planned, and it is unlikely foster father. Review: It's hard to not like Big Daddy, even diehard fans of Adam Sandler can also cringe at this step in the sentimentalització comedian. Because, although this film has angered some worrywarts too sensitive for his apparent approval of free parents, my film is actually very gentle s hard edges. This actually seems to Sandler's command might be wise to go now, because as an actor, it delivers the appropriate aura of pure sympathy with the average Joe. Big Daddy can be a better film if it has come so easily to sentimentality and predictable emotional lift, but Sandler deadpan portrait of mature adults forced to grow in a fully responsible parenthood means that the film depicts quite enjoyable.Sandler 30, at Manhattan south of lost lives, milking a small foot injury at the rate of $ 200,000 for judicial resolution and life, therefore, consists of small jobs, lack of direction and girlfriends who are ready to move to an old man with a 5-year plan. When a child suddenly shows the door (children are not known until now friends), Sandler decided to take her under temporary protection in the hope of getting his girlfriend. Thus, a man who almost no help mature adults trying to instill life lessons symmetry minded and willing young, very impressionable. This leads to Sandler teaching children to enjoy predictable, but surprisingly shy behavior, antisocial, and urinating in public buildings, stay late, tripping unsuspecting skaters etc. This film is not always at the top of the creative freshness at this time , but cynical shadow hangs over Lowkey Sandler Sandler provides some humor.As grows to care for him Although the forces against various unavoidable to take the girl, the film deviates toward sentimentality and maudlin tearjerking. One can move at times, but also wit and biting satirical desire that can have bold script provided.The enlightened vision of the film does not show gay (although Hollywood was quite beyond the point where gay characters can do more than just shine one each other), but lose points for tone rather unpleasant for parents. However, any film that is designed to send Dr. Laura cramps psychotherapy should be respected and honored.Overall anger, Big Daddy is a film that, if they are taking a more daring way, it can be firstrate comedy. So, it provides a lot of laughs and tender feeling the heat - and, given that many of today's big screen comedy, all who dare to leave us expect.
Year: 1994 Genre: Drama, Romance Director: Robert Zemeckis Starring: Tom Hanks, Sally Field, Robin Wright
Description: Forrest Gump, while not intelligent, accidentally present at many historic time, but his love, Jenny Curran, eludes him. Review: I believe that everyone is entitled to their own opinion on movies and other topics. However, many of the reviews I read about this movie, I do not think that many people have received the bulk of the message is a writer and filmmaker. This film is a great modern fairy tale, a fairy tale, the dictionary meaning of the short story that teaches a moral issue. There are many morals to this movie, but most of integrity and simple goodness.I is a half-sister, who grew up in South America, and in a beszélgettü , women in this movie, and he said that it feels dimwitted south. I agree avèkl who told him that the author himself is native to south. The story focuses on the environment of allowing the story to unfold with real events and FAB before us.The beautiful film directed by Robert Zemeckis film of his opus, he was rewarded with a great cast all levels. The children who andthe Gump Forrest Gump Jr., Haley Joel Osment. Say what you want, but I feel like Tom Hanks deserved the Oscar. Gary Sinise is synonymous Lt.Dan when you hear these words. Sally Garden respectful of mother love in difficult situations. Mykelti Williamson as Bubba gives a real sense of history that Gump was a true friend, she moved to the characters as well. Do not handle the full power of your words Robin Wright Penn as Jenny. Jennys tenderness and pain can be felt as soon as the Wright.I feel that a lot of the appeal is the sense of doing the right thing right Gumps függetlenüla situation around, and we see that in this movie. In this situation, perhaps we all want just a little more than that, trying to keep the natural goodness and no compromises often do as you go down life movie highways. A too, theater, comedy and challenge the norms of society. Then there are endless quotes from the film that slipped into everyday speech. They say too much in this point.One tope me of the movie, when Forrest is an embarrassment to the life and ask the Lt.Dan say all the adversity and the mother that is where everything is just floating like a feather in the wind. Topics forrests characters very well with this quote, I think a bit of both. From my experience in life, it seems that way. So if you have not seen the movie, see you soon for a real treat. If you do not like it, try it again and hopefully you'll see it's a good story!
22 
5
